Back to Discussion Summary Page
Discussion Title: PT Turbo vs WRX
| Tbird4747 |
2005-06-15 00:05:00 |
PT Turbo vs WRX
My friend has a stock 2005 WRX automatic and I have a manual Pt Cruiser Turbo. The WRX puches out about 227 hp and 217 lbs of torque through four wheels. My PT pushes 220 hp and 245 lbs of torque throught the front wheels. The cars weight roughly the same. Who would win in the 1/4 mile. I accept defeat in the areas of coolness and all that, although he is probably the biggest poser ever driving an auto WRX.
|
| LjasonL |
2005-06-15 01:56:00 |
|
As much as I hate to say it, you'd probably beat him
__________________ 
|
| k3smostwanted |
2005-06-15 15:32:00 |
|
yeah, it really depends on how far ahead he gets on launch because you should start catching back up slowly. but he will have you launch due to the AWD.
__________________ 
Twin Turbo/5-speed Swap in the making and a few upgrades along the way!!!
Please visit My Car Doman Page to see more pics and sign my guestbook.
 ZedEx Crew Member #4
|
| BlackGT2000 |
2005-06-15 16:09:00 |
Re: PT Turbo vs WRX
It will be pretty close, I don't expect anyone to gain any major bragging rights here.
|
| slideways... |
2005-06-15 16:11:00 |
Re: PT Turbo vs WRX
really... i would have thought the wrx would win.
ive seen my buddy's 02 wrx with just CAI and cat-back exhaust kill evos, s2000s, rx7s ect.
__________________ 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyline_BNR34
This is your signature: arguing on the internet is like competing in the special olympics, even if you win....you're still retarded.
Represent Minnesota
|
| BlackGT2000 |
2005-06-15 16:29:00 |
Re: Re: PT Turbo vs WRX
Quote:
Originally Posted by slideways...
really... i would have thought the wrx would win.
ive seen my buddy's 02 wrx with just CAI and cat-back exhaust kill evos, s2000s, rx7s ect.
Thats pretty good for a regular WRX, you sure he dosn't have more than that done? The S2000 I can believe, they really aren't as fast as people would have you believe.
|
| slideways... |
2005-06-15 16:40:00 |
Re: PT Turbo vs WRX
yeah i helped him work on the car. generic cold air intake and hks hipower exhaust. thats it.
the evo also had cold air, turbo-back exhaust, and boost controller running 1.3 Bar (19psi i think)
i watched it with my own eyes i couldnt believe it either but he beat the evo by 2 carlengths
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyline_BNR34
This is your signature: arguing on the internet is like competing in the special olympics, even if you win....you're still retarded.
Represent Minnesota
|
| kman10587 |
2005-06-15 16:56:00 |
Re: PT Turbo vs WRX
S2000s are really pretty slow in a straight-line. Unless you're willing to launch from 6000 rpm and incinerate your clutch over and over again, the best it can do is about 14.5 in the quarter mile. And I can believe a WRX with those mods beating an Evo with those mods, if the WRX driver was a better driver.
__________________  
My Camry...someday.
|
| ludespeed501 |
2005-06-15 18:39:00 |
|
__________________
2001 Honda Prelude
|
| mason_RsX |
2005-06-15 20:11:00 |
Re: Re: Re: PT Turbo vs WRX
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackGT2000
Thats pretty good for a regular WRX, you sure he dosn't have more than that done? The S2000 I can believe, they really aren't as fast as people would have you believe.
So true! yeah you get 240hp, but you have the smallest powerband alive and no torque...then again Id kill for one
__________________
No car, just College in Halifax... Don't pretend you know where that is
|
| BlackGT2000 |
2005-06-16 12:43:00 |
Re: PT Turbo vs WRX
Damn I bet that evo guy was surprised, bet he thought it would have taken the STI to get him. Mason, I agree with the S2000 being a nice car though, and also that its not exactly a rocket.
|
| kman10587 |
2005-06-16 15:55:00 |
Re: PT Turbo vs WRX
I've never really liked the S2000. It's not that it's a bad car, I just don't like having that great a lack of torque. And also, as good as the performance is, there is definitely better for $30K-35K. The car is all about the driving experience - you either enjoy it or you don't.
__________________
My Camry...someday.
|
| k3smostwanted |
2005-06-16 16:04:00 |
Re: Re: PT Turbo vs WRX
Quote:
Originally Posted by kman10587
I've never really liked the S2000. It's not that it's a bad car, I just don't like having that great a lack of torque. And also, as good as the performance is, there is definitely better for $30K-35K. The car is all about the driving experience - you either enjoy it or you don't.
i enjoyed it...but it would never be something id buy. the one i drove felt like i never hit a power band. it was moving but it felt like there should have been alot more...plus i dont like the whole girly 2 seater convertible look. thats the type of car that makes a grown man question is his sexuality. but yeah, i love to see one...especially one with a hot woman driving it but its not for me.
__________________
Twin Turbo/5-speed Swap in the making and a few upgrades along the way!!!
Please visit My Car Doman Page to see more pics and sign my guestbook.
ZedEx Crew Member #4
|
| BlackGT2000 |
2005-06-16 16:23:00 |
Re: PT Turbo vs WRX
I agree, I like it I will admit, but for the price I would be looking at a 04 Mach1, or Cobra (personally). If they were out of the question I think the next thing I would definately rather have for the price would be the 350Z.
|
| k3smostwanted |
2005-06-16 16:41:00 |
Re: Re: PT Turbo vs WRX
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackGT2000
I agree, I like it I will admit, but for the price I would be looking at a 04 Mach1, or Cobra (personally). If they were out of the question I think the next thing I would definately rather have for the price would be the 350Z.
i dont like the 350Z either...im rather dissappointed in the 350Z. it should be so much more but its not. a 3.5L from nissan should be destroying a honda 4 cylinder or mazda N/A rotary. instead it only beats them by a small margin in acceleration peformance and the handling feel isnt even on par. im actually quite dissappointed in the RX8 too. the s2000 impresses me more than the other 2 but i would never waste my money on any of them. after creating such extroadinary cars in the mid 90's...it is embarassing to create something 15 years later that doesnt totally demolish what the previous generation offered. i understand that they wanted to keep the price down but still...
id take a used M3 for that kind of money...or an audi s4.
__________________
Twin Turbo/5-speed Swap in the making and a few upgrades along the way!!!
Please visit My Car Doman Page to see more pics and sign my guestbook.
ZedEx Crew Member #4
|
|
