Back to Discussion Summary Page
Discussion Title: PT Turbo vs WRX
| SuperHighOutput |
2005-06-17 20:11:00 |
Re: PT Turbo vs WRX
Should be a close race.
As for S2Ks, nice cars, not my cup of tea, for the money I'd much rather have a GTO.
|
| Muscletang |
2005-06-19 17:35:00 |
|
I'll say the guy will beat you off the line with the AWD but you'll eventually pass and defeat him.
As for the S2000, sure they handle well but what's their 1/4 mile time, 2 weeks?
__________________
“A flute with no holes is no flute, and a donut with no hole is a Danish.” Great Zen Philosopher
|
| slideways... |
2005-06-19 21:48:00 |
Re: PT Turbo vs WRX
rofl whats the 1/4 mile time of a 2000 mustang gt then? must be a month
an s2000 with a capable driver will hit 13.9
__________________ 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyline_BNR34
This is your signature: arguing on the internet is like competing in the special olympics, even if you win....you're still retarded.
Represent Minnesota
|
| kman10587 |
2005-06-20 00:03:00 |
Re: PT Turbo vs WRX
Sorry, but the only way you are going to hit sub-14's in an S2000 is to launch it from a ridiculously high RPM, which will destroy your clutch VERY quickly. Car and Driver went through this a few years back. The car just does not have the power-to-weight ratio, not to mention the torque, aerodynamics, or gearing, to put up sub-14 runs, without seriously damaging the car.
__________________  
My Camry...someday.
|
| BlackGT2000 |
2005-06-20 14:53:00 |
Re: PT Turbo vs WRX
Haha yeah a month.......It will match the S2000 for $10000 less. An S2000 will run a 13 like a 99-04 GT mustang will run a 13, extremely few an far between.
|
| [EvERMoRe] |
2005-06-26 01:30:00 |
Re: PT Turbo vs WRX
Quote:
Originally Posted by LjasonL
As much as I hate to say it, you'd probably beat him
in perfect conditions.... dry warm road, good tires... etc. anything other and the sube should win... unless this guy is awesome with launching and shifting.
|
|
