Back to Discussion Summary Page
Discussion Title: RE XXX Question
| KMoney28 |
2005-05-03 13:50:00 |
RE XXX Question
So I've been thinkin about getting 2 XXX12's in the summer when i get some cash. Now a friend of a friend has 2 12" RE MT's. He's gonna sell them but he is having them reconed to be XXX's. He is selling them somewhere in the $200 range. My question is is it worth it to buy these reconed subs/will they be the same as the XXX? Any advantages/disadvantages to buying subs that are reconed?
__________________
Sub: 1 15" Digital Designs 9500 in a slot ported box with 6 cubes
Sub Amp: Autotek MX-3000.1
Component Amp: 300 watt Pioneer
Headunit: Alpine CDA-9831
Speakers: 5.25 Sony's and 6x9 Pioneer's(Both of which need to be replaced so give me some suggestions)
Optima Yellowtop battery
Lanzar 5 farad Optifree capacitor
|
| L|_|da |
2005-05-03 14:44:00 |
Re: RE XXX Question
wtf, you can recone subs? thats a new one to me... srry no help here.
|
| Mannyb18b |
2005-05-03 14:47:00 |
Re: RE XXX Question
^ how u didnt know that is beyond me
__________________
1996 Acura Integra Gs/Ls- B16 pistons, arp studs, honed throttle body, 4in intake, custom exhaust
Yellow Top + 600CCA in trunk
Clarion H/U
JL Audio 5 1/4 VR-Series Components
Rear Fill- 05 sony 6x9's (do the job)
Profile AP1040 on Front Stage n Rear Fill
Substage: SOLD
|
| UndercoverPunk |
2005-05-03 15:38:00 |
Re: RE XXX Question
So MT motors with XXX softparts?
Why would you do that? I don't get it...
|
| sr20de4evr |
2005-05-03 15:52:00 |
Re: RE XXX Question
yeah I don't get it either, the heart of the XXX IS its motor, without that it's just a weak MT.
__________________ My Site
For Sale: Elemental Designs e12a (local only), PM for details
|
| L|_|da |
2005-05-03 15:57:00 |
Re: Re: RE XXX Question
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mannyb18b
^ how u didnt know that is beyond me
cuz im fairly new to car audio....
|
| Diceman83 |
2005-05-03 16:48:00 |
Re: RE XXX Question
an SE with XXX parts is cool (the whole seXXX thing), but I don't get putting XXX parts on an MT chassis... It would just be a slightly quieter SPL sub, right?
__________________ 
|
| CBFryman |
2005-05-03 17:52:00 |
Re: RE XXX Question
it would be an SPL sub with lower powerhandleing. wouldnt get as loud and couldnt take the power that MT coils can. i want an reXXX or an sxXXX or an reSX or an reSE or.... maybe RE needs to bring back the HC...lmao
__________________  '00 Mazda B3000: BX1205D, RE Comps, Waiting for Avalanche 18, 1/0 Big 3
I Got A Nomination For Funnies Post of the Year In the Street Racing Forum
|
| ngsm13 |
2005-05-03 18:02:00 |
Re: Re: RE XXX Question
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBFryman
it would be an SPL sub with lower powerhandleing. wouldnt get as loud and couldnt take the power that MT coils can. i want an reXXX or an sxXXX or an reSX or an reSE or.... maybe RE needs to bring back the HC...lmao
You know absolutely nothing about the HC None of those RE-- could exist because of coil size duh!
As stated above, the MT uses an ENTIRELY different motor than the XXX...that's mainly what makes them different. They both DO however utilize 3" VC's. The MT have a SHIT TON of BL, no pole vent, and utilizes quad triple stiff spiders (SPL configuration), the MT motor also has an EXTREMELY tight gap.
So, in a word...NO...it would be stupid.
NG
__________________
I design custom enclosures!
And...my sig is short!
Oh and.. YOU suck balls...
|
| CBFryman |
2005-05-03 20:02:00 |
Re: RE XXX Question
CH is duh shiznit....lol. actually ive never even seen one in person. wasnt it one of RE's first subs?
__________________ '00 Mazda B3000: BX1205D, RE Comps, Waiting for Avalanche 18, 1/0 Big 3
I Got A Nomination For Funnies Post of the Year In the Street Racing Forum
|
| GSteg |
2005-05-03 20:40:00 |
Re: RE XXX Question
i had (2) 15" RE HC quad 1 ohm coil with dual spider. David sold me those and i kind of regret i sold them. I should have sold only one of them and keep the other as a coffee table. lol
__________________
www.onfyre.net/forums
come and join the forum!
|
| CBFryman |
2005-05-03 20:55:00 |
Re: RE XXX Question
^^
meesa assumes they pretty shitty
__________________ '00 Mazda B3000: BX1205D, RE Comps, Waiting for Avalanche 18, 1/0 Big 3
I Got A Nomination For Funnies Post of the Year In the Street Racing Forum
|
| Diceman83 |
2005-05-03 21:11:00 |
Re: RE XXX Question
There you go making assumptions... bad idea. Never works for me.
__________________
|
| bumpinstang77 |
2005-05-03 22:11:00 |
Re: RE XXX Question
HC's were a ported box good sq crazy low end sub. SX's are louder, but not as SQ oriented and FYI Beyond Audio Inhumans are HC's so if you ever hear either you've heard both.
__________________
1997 Ford Mustang 3.8v-6 5-speed
150 amp alternator
optima yellow top
Panasonic cq-c8100u (not in yet)
2 SI Magunum D2 12's
4.5 cuft NET ported box tuned to 28hz w/ 70 sqin of port area
Avionixx 1200.2
Will soon buy CDt HD62's, DLS UR6, adire koda set, or sumthin along those lines and an amp to power it (prolly an avionixx 400.2)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
new sig pic soming soon!!!
|
| ngsm13 |
2005-05-03 23:44:00 |
Re: Re: RE XXX Question
Quote:
Originally Posted by bumpinstang77
HC's were a ported box good sq crazy low end sub. SX's are louder, but not as SQ oriented and FYI Beyond Audio Inhumans are HC's so if you ever hear either you've heard both.
Well, that same motors
Different soft parts...yeilding similar but different performance...
The Inhumans were also more customizable hahaha...if you guys new what I was talking about...lol
NG
__________________
I design custom enclosures!
And...my sig is short!
Oh and.. YOU suck balls...
|
|
