|
 |
Posts & Solutions
|
 |
 |
Back to Discussion Summary Page
Discussion Title: 300zx tt vs. 3000gt vr-4
| matt11583 |
2005-05-15 21:03:00 |
300zx tt vs. 3000gt vr-4
which car is better for performance???and between 300zx na and 3000gt type sl wchich one is better?????just askin for others opionoins
|
| k3smostwanted |
2005-05-15 23:27:00 |
Re: 300zx tt vs. 3000gt vr-4
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt11583
which car is better for performance???and between 300zx na and 3000gt type sl wchich one is better?????just askin for others opionoins
the 3000gt VR4 has the edge in the 1/4 mile due to its AWD but the 300zxTT has the ability to keep pace due to its very strong 2nd and 3rd gear. i have seen both get beaten by each other but i would still give the edge to VR4 in the 1/4 mile on the average.
every other aspect of the performance i would give the edge to the 300zxTT eventhough someone will probably argue my statement.
as for the N/A versions: there dead even i would say...i have heard of N/A's beating SL's and i have heard of SL's beating N/A's. if they are 5-speed probably boils down to driver. if its automatic, probably who knows their car better and who can brake launch better in the 1/4 mile. i would give the edge to the 300zx on the average for this one due to the RWD vs. FWD when launching.
as for handling, i will give that to either 300zx eventhough either 3000gt is a very good handling even for the weight of the VR4 and the FWD of the SL.
i myself have beating 2 SL's in my N/A days...1 stock and 1 lightly modified. and i had a 2+2 automatic with pop-charger and cat-back...
__________________ 
Twin Turbo/5-speed Swap in the making and a few upgrades along the way!!!
Please visit My Car Doman Page to see more pics and sign my guestbook.
 ZedEx Crew Member #4
|
| kman10587 |
2005-05-16 01:02:00 |
Re: 300zx tt vs. 3000gt vr-4
I'd give it to the 300ZX N/A. FWD starts to become a liability once you exceed two-hundred ft-lbs of torque, and the 300ZX is gonna have a much easier time managing tire slip on corner exit. If you just care about drag racing, then either one will work fine, but again, FWD is gonna make launching a bitch, and it'll come back to haunt you once you start tuning the car up.
__________________  
My Camry...someday.
|
| NISSANSPDR |
2005-05-16 02:35:00 |
Re: 300zx tt vs. 3000gt vr-4
Between the TT versions...the VR4 on the launch but the Z will catch up due to less weight
Between the NA versions...the Z for being RWD and getting a better launch and it will stay ahead
|
| Muscletang |
2005-05-16 18:32:00 |
|
As much as I like the Z I think I'll give it to the VR-4. It's a very close race though either way you cut it and you can't go wrong with either.
__________________
“A flute with no holes is no flute, and a donut with no hole is a Danish.” Great Zen Philosopher
|
| Igovert500 |
2005-05-16 19:10:00 |
Re: 300zx tt vs. 3000gt vr-4
I would (did) take the vr4 when it comes to TT, but the Z between the 2 NAs.
__________________
96 3000gt vr4
-K&N FIPK
-Proboost mbc
-Cusco front + rear strut bars
-Greddy type-s
-ATR downpipe
-no cats
Boost IS Better Crew Member #1
|
| illegal_eagle187 |
2005-05-16 23:04:00 |
Re: 300zx tt vs. 3000gt vr-4
yeah definately the VR-4 on the launch but i think the Z in the long run
__________________ 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
